On 19 October Mr Justice Simmons in the Irish High Court handed down judgment in the matter of J (A person subject to an allegation of abuse) and The Child and Family Agency  IEHC 464 and in so doing quashed a decision by TUSLA, the Irish Child and Family Agency (CFA), which had arrived at a “provisional conclusion” that J (the alleged abuser as he is described in the judgment) had engaged in sexual acts with a child (the complainant as he is described in the judgment) in the CFA’s review of historic allegations of child sexual abuse that the complainant had made to the CFA in December 2013. Under the provisions of the Child Care Act 1991 (as amended) the CFA must inquire into complaints of child sexual abuse, including historical abuse.Continue reading
Readers of the blog will be aware that we have recently reported on serious issues that have arisen in respect of Tusla and the exercise of its statutory duties in our blog of the 21 June and 3 September 2019.
The Irish Child and Family Agency came in for further criticism in a judgment handed down in the Irish High Court on 2 September by Mr Justice Meenan.
The case before the High Court arose in circumstances where a teacher was accused of smacking a female student on the bottom and allegedly making inappropriate comments to her.